When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.
For an example an IRS agent is taught to go out and collect money under the guise of a tax.
Sherry Peel Jackson and Joe Banister, both former IRS employees, will be the first to tell you that the government’s education of tax laws is very limited. Due to the tax honesty people and groups around the country they
both discovered that they were, unwittingly, involved in a racketeering enterprise sponsored by the government.
Up to this point, how many people at that time were thinking that agent Jackson and Banister were corrupt and they were acting with criminal intent to steal your money?
Jackson and Banister both admit that they were honestly mistaken and they both decided to tell the world, in lieu of ceasing to be honest; but not without a price, Jackson was charged and convicted and sentenced, and Banister was indicted and won.
In contrast from another true story.
I had several agents pursuing me to pay an income tax, when I confronted them with the truth and the factual bases of why I believed that the law is perfect and must be complied with – all of it – even by the IRS and that I believed that the law must be applied openly and standing
on the FACT that only Congress writes the law, executive administrative regulations cannot deviate from statute. Thereupon asking them questions to dispute my interpretations of the tax code, which I adopted right out of David Myrland’s Criminal Complaint, that I sent to Congress they obviously chose to cease to be honest.
When it came to the following challenges they laid silent, in other words, they refused to
answer the questions:
Issue A: Respondent wants for requisite statutory authority to act against Petitioner;
Issue B: Respondent want for requisite statutory leave to operate [my favorite at my time in front of the grand jury];
Issue C: Petitioner must violate regulation to satisfy the IRS in its demands for a Form 1040, other;
Issue D: Petitioner violates 26 USC §§83, 212, 1001, 1011, and 1012 when reporting compensation for services as gross income.
On Issues A, in a civil case, the government asked for protective order to
protect the IRS from having to answer the questions THEY DO NOT WANT THE TRUTH TO GET OUT!!!
GET THE TRUTH OUT
SEND EVERYONE TO
