Delegation of power

Published: Wed, 10/07/15

MAXIMS OF LAW
“potestas delegata non potesta delegare”
(You can not delegate the authority delegated)

“A delegated power cannot be again delegated.

The derivative power cannot be greater than the original from which it is derived.

Power can never be delegated which the authorities said to delegate never possessed itself.

An equal has no power over an equal.

Power is now synonymous with the right.
In Florida the definition of “Agency” pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act is found at Title X, §120.52, to wit:
(1) “Agency” means the following officers or governmental entities if acting pursuant to powers other than those derived from the constitution:
(a) The Governor; each state officer and state department, and each departmental unit described in s. 20.04; the Board of Governors of the State University System; the Commission on Ethics; the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; a regional water supply authority; a regional planning agency; a multicounty special district, but only if a majority of its governing board is comprised of nonelected persons; educational units; and each entity described in chapters 163, 373, 380, and 582 and s. 186.504.
From the book “Is Administrative Law Unlawful?” Chapter 20 goes into “subdelegated”, which provides additional information how the administrative laws are nonconstitutional.

I’m going to highlight some information from time to time out of this book, however, since this book is over 600 + pages I will try to cover the most relevant information.

"A common defense of administrative law and its consolidation of powers is delegation. A principal can’t delegate his powers to an agent, and on this basis Congress is said to delegate legislative and judicial power to the executive.

A major effect of this delegation argument is to break down the specialization of government powers. Whereas the Constitution preserves the specialization of government powers by placing them in their own specialized parts of government, delegation seems to explain how they nonetheless can be consolidated within the executive.

As it happens, the delegation defense often is more theoretical than realistic, because much executive legislation and adjudication goes beyond congressional authorization. Nonetheless, delegation is an appealing theory for defenders of administrative law, as it seems the best means of justifying the otherwise unlawful consolidation of powers.

The delegation excuse, however, misstates the problem, for the difficulty is not delegation, but subdelegation. By means of the Constitution, the people delegate power to government. In particular, they delegate specialized power to each branch of government. Accordingly, when Congress purports to give its legislative power to the executive, the question is not whether the principal can delegate the power, but whether the agent can subdelegated.

Of course, when Congress authorizes the executive to exercise a rulemaking power that is not legislative, there is no unlawful subdelegation.

The subdelegation problem thus arises primarily where Congress authorizes others to make legally binding rules, for this binding rulemaking by its nature and by constitutional grant, is legislative. In such matters, a congressional attempt to authorize administrator’s amounts to an unlawful subdelegation of legislative power."
CryptoCurrency
Gold Backed
Learn How to Mine
Watch How Your Money Can Grow
http://cryptogoldbackedcurrency.com/

Christopher Chapman
WAKE UP AMERICANS
321.264.6383
americanliberties.llc@gmail.com
Help us, to help you, to help others to help America
http://totalassetprotector.com/americanliberties