Here you see information in a case where the United States of America, plaintiff, versus William Richard Bailey, defendant. The defendant filed motions based on the indictment was
initiated by false evidence fabricated by the government.
I am interested in this case because it brings up a lot of interesting points. It brings up how the government manipulates the codes to produce the documents for the IMF when doing the substitute returns. Also it brings up the subject of statue bonds (covering 600 years of
English revenue procedures).
The government does not challenge, in their response, several points that the defendant brought up.
As I quickly went through this case, which I will be
reading it for some time to come, I find it interesting to note that if they were only to put Dave Myrland’s arguments I wondered the outcome would’ve been any different.
With all the arguments that you see the back-and-forth exchange, I’m surprised that the defendant did not bring up their best witness on the subject of the
computerized documents which is the
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE!
The government has documented that the IRS computer generated documents are not "ART"
- Accurate
- Reliable
- Trustworthy
Would have been perfect timing. Of course let us not forget I’m only named in the regulation and not in the statutes and section 83.
The files are straight from PACER
