Hold on!!! Looks like the FDCPA does apply to the IRS

Published: Fri, 07/31/15

Please find below responses that I received regarding the FDCPA
Hi Chappy, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/part-VI/chapter-176  is required to do to take your money.  You will be amazed to see that they cannot levy your pay, or even contact your employer.  They need to submit affidavits, also.   Also they need is issue specific notices and have a US marshal serve them and collect on the judgments.I have the annotated code on this and what is amazing is that after over 20 years there is virtually no case law on this....gee after reading the requirements I wonder why.
PAUL F. MARKHAM, TRUSTEE, Plaintiff, v. CLAIRE M. FAY, AS TRUSTEE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE NURSING HOME TRUST, PARKER HILL NURSING HOME TRUST, AND GREEN PASTURES NURSING HOME TRUST, Defendant, Appellant, and UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 95-1631

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

74 F.3d 1347; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1743; 96-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,118; 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 732

 February 7, 1996, Decided
 Other than by levy, the IRS can collect by a proceeding in court, either by bringing an action pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7403, or by simply suing for the amount owed and then exercising "the usual rights of a judgment creditor" to enforce any judgment obtained.  United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677, 682, 76 L. Ed. 2d 236, 103 S. Ct. 2132 (1983). This is not a section 7403 action and neither party contends that it is. 5 The IRS is therefore exercising the usual rights of a judgment creditor. It asserts (inconsistently with its indication that it levied on the trust property) that the Federal Debt Collection Procedure Act of 1990 (FDCPA), 28 U.S.C. § 3001, et seq., governs the interpleader proceedings, and Fay does not contend otherwise. Fay's tax indebtedness is a "debt" as defined in the FDCPA because it is "an amount owing to the United States on account of [an] . . . assessment."  [**13]  28 U.S.C. § 3002(3)(B). Except to the extent that another federal law specifies procedures for recovering on a judgment for a debt arising under such law, the FDCPA is the exclusive civil procedure for the government to recover a judgment on a debt.  28 U.S.C. § 3001(a), (b). The tax code (from which the debt arose) does specify procedures for recovering on a judgment by levy, 26 U.S.C. § 6331, and by filing an action in a federal district court to enforce a lien, 26 U.S.C. § 7403, but does not contain specific procedures for otherwise recovering on a judgment, for example by filing a derivative claim in bankruptcy court and litigating against the taxpayer in a resulting interpleader action, as the IRS did here. Thus, the procedures of the FDCPA appropriately control.
Here is another response that I received.
​Have you read 28USC3002? Here is a comment by Larry Becraft:
Have you read 28USC3002? Here is a comment by Larry Becraft:
“That section is merely a part of the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990, 104 Stat. 4933. The first section of that act is codified at 28 USC 3001, which is posted here.”“Please read this section, then click the �next� button on the bottom right corner of this page to read the next section, which is the section alleged to support this argument. There are lots of federal corporations, and this act applies to the debt collection activities of those corporations, among others. Wherever the act uses the term �United States,� the definition in 3002 declares that it applies not only to the debt collection activities of the United States, but also the federal corporations. Of this I am certain: there are many �rumor creators� in this movement and you are ripe for the deception if you never do any research to confirm what is alleged.” 
 
WE HAVE CREATED A GLOBAL CATEGORY 5 FINANCIAL STORM 
IF YOU KNOW ANYONE WHO FALL UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THEY MAY NEED YOUR HELP!
HUNGRY
SINGLE MOTHER WITH NO JOB
BURIED IN DEBT
THE JOBLESS
STUDENT LOANS THAT WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO PAY OFF
THE HOMELESS
ETC, ETC