From David R. Myrland - WEvGOV.com
Happy New Year from American Liberties, LLC!
Meaningful civic duty begins with writing and filing criminal complaints against offenders in public office; I’ve done a lot of this and made a course on FLASH drive with hours of audio instruction and criminal complaints in Microsoft Word that I’ve written over the years. I didn’t truly understand the courts and the cops until I read my state’s
criminal code, and it was only after I filed my first criminal complaint against a judge that I got any respect from our servants.
http://wevgov.com/01_pages/01_b_PRODUCTS.htm
2018 - THREE petitions to the Supreme Court and the government still has no interpretation of Tax Code § 83! Actually it’s far worse than that. You have a lot of catching up to do at WEvGOV.com.
SEDM.org, aka The Family Guardian says, “By far the most prolific source of research on this topic (the Tax Code) is David Myrland.”
My treatise on the differences between the IRS and the law was complete in 1993 and written in early 1994, and has prevented more than one dozen tax indictments since 2006. By October of 1998 I had written five Tax Court clients all of the way to the Supreme Court where they were denied certiorari. By 2001 I was 5 for 6 against the Oregon State AG
in civil court (unfair trade practices suits). In 2018 I concluded three tax cases by getting denied by the Supreme Court from the 7th, 9th, and 11th Circuits.
Tax Code § 83 explains how to tax every penny of compensation for services paid to every employee and every self employed individual. I’m the only one in the known universes that even teaches about it. No CPA, attorney, IRS agent, or anyone else knows anything about the statute, and the courts will penalize you thousands of dollars for “frivolity”
if you argue it but nobody can say why my interpretation is invalid. I wrote a manual about in 1994 and added a thirty page epilogue in 2014, and I’m still the only one who’s written about it. There’s simply nobody else to talk to about § 83(a) which explains how to tax the entire workforce.
“The Right to Be Informed.- Taxpayers have the right to know what they need to do to comply with the tax laws. They
are entitled to clear explanations of the laws and IRS procedures in all tax forms, instructions, publications, notices, and correspondence. They have the right to be informed of IRS decisions about their tax accounts and to receive clear explanations of the outcomes.”
See: [ https://www.irs.gov/Taxpayer-Bill-of-Rights ]. See also, Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co., 300 US 481, 498 (1937) (“The taxpayers were entitled to know
the basis of law and fact on which the Commissioner sought to sustain the deficiencies.”).
The US gov’t has no interpretation of § 83; why is that? Section 83 DOES NOT say that your entire paycheck is gross income, but rather only the excess “over the amount (if any) paid” is to be included in gross income.
My website is plain and simple, and it contains nothing but law and case law. If you claim that the IRS is in violation of § 83 you’re a tax protester but it can’t say why, when it’s had my argument since 1993.
WEvGOV.com and click on “ENTER” to view its content.
My opponent in this year’s litigation was the DOJ’s top tax attorney, Principle Deputy Ass’t Attny General Richard E. Zuckerman. One exchange of briefs with him is at:
WEvGOV.com/Orth
From there you can link to my YouTube channel “Take From Caesar” where you’ll many tutorials about law, tax law, and other great stuff. I very much like that you’re making forays into the criminal code because I’ve been applying criminal statutes to public servants since 2001, and I offer courses on FLASH drive about
writing and filing criminal complaints state/fed, Drive-by Litigation is about addressing municipal misconduct, a course about criminal intent, and others you’ll see on my products page. (http://wevgov.com/01_pages/01_b_PRODUCTS.htm).
I argue only statutes and regulations, which proves that I’m not part of any anti-tax movement, patriot movement, or “sovereign citizen” collective; I’m totally independent. The Orth exchange of briefs proves I write on par with the DOJ’s best, as I have for many years.
Montelepre Systemed, Inc. v. C.I.R., 956 F.2d 496, 498 at [1] (CA5 1992): “Section 83(a) explains how property received in exchange for services is taxed.”
Gudmundsson v. US, 634 F.3d 212 (CA2 2011): “At the heart of this case is I.R.C. § 83, which governs the taxation of property transferred in connection with the performance of services.”
“How did § 83 operate in your conclusion that I owe a tax on my pay?”
That question shuts down all debate, Tax Court imposes enormous sanctions, the appellate courts might and sometimes do same, and the gov’t has no interpretation of it, they don’t train on it, they ignore it altogether, and you can’t have it. There’s a lot about this on my sites; enjoy.
So, you don’t have to believe me, American, interpret § 83 yourself. We all have to comply with it; nobody has a choice. Nobody but me and my students have a clue about it.
You are now a tax protester, American. If a statute operated in the IRS’ favor, don’t you think they’d whip you with it? I say § 83 and related provisions provide a mandatory method of calculating cost for anyone who sells personal services for their fair market value. After 25+ years
the best the IRS/DOJ can do is the reply brief in the Orth exchange of briefs.
Please share this message with all of your contacts, urge your favorite guru to learn code pleading, and have more confidence in the law the gov’t is obviously violating.
Any talk show host who’d like to interview me should contact Chris Chapman at AmericanLiberties.LLC@gmail.com
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year from American Liberties, LLC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9Esf4MATIU&t=6s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWZ10bpVmp0&t=6s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bey0EfpKeiQ&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPft2HhtN6Q&t=1523s
