​​​​​​​THAT 7^th CIRCUIT TAX CASE is now in the Supreme Court (filed 9/18/2018) to see if 42 key provisions will remain off limits, and to see if the imposition of penalties by the circuit court for purely statutory arguments satisfies due process requirements.

READ THOSE ARGUMENTS and the plainly evasive reply by the galaxy’s finest tax attorney, Principle Deputy Ass’t Attorney General, Richard E. Zuckerman, top man at the DOJ’s tax division.

THIRD SUPREME COURT PETITION filed this year over and around these same provisions (7^th, 9^th, and 11^th circuits) and nobody in gov’t can give the clear explanation of the law promised in the Taxpayer’s Bill of rights. Can they just do that with the statute that explains how to tax the entire workforce? If 26 USC § 83 allowed the IRS to demand what it demands, wouldn’t everybody be eager to club a bunch of citizens with it?

WOULD YOU LIKE some statutory arguments the gov’t can’t refute? If so, see what a competent researcher and jurist can do using just controlling provisions, as were found in his 1994 treatise called Code Breaker. Compare the briefing on the 7^th Circuit to the writings of anybody else.

JUST THE FREE STUFF - You have a lot of catching up to do . . .

WEvGOV.com   (products/courses here)

TakeFromCaesar.us

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4OSWo_uoplVCnphB-l4LPA/videos?disable_polymer=1

OBSERVE WHAT the finest mind in tax law discovered, briefed, and has assailed taxing authorities throughout state and federal agencies with since 1994.