Hello, American! Can we talk?
Realistically speaking, as you look around America at its many groups of anti-IRS protesters, and as you look at the many different takes or spins on “understanding income taxes,” nobody has ever explained how the Tax Code operates to impose taxes, who the Tax Code is
directed at or who is subject, or even how to calculate your cost when you sell your personal services. How many of the “leaders” actually know how to sue in federal court? Indictments of Pete Hendrickson tax return filers are still flowing, the redemption process is still landing good Americans in prison, and these “leaders” have nothing to offer in the way of a legal defense or even a briefing of their conclusions regarding income taxation. All of it is just one big experiment that seeks to
lose your property and liberty to the IRS and the FED.
Why would you do that?
In Revenue Ruling 2007-19 the IRS says, “Section 83 provides for the determination of the amount
to be included in gross income and the timing of the inclusion when property is transferred to an employee or independent contractor in connection with the performance of services."
Pete Hendrickson says, “It’s gibberish.” The law that explains how to tax any and all compensation is
“gibberish” to Pete Hendrickson. Why would you listen to a thing the guy says? What he meant to say is, “Due to my lack of skills in statutory interpretation, I can’t find my Tax Code with both hands.” To the rest of us it means, “I know nothing of the statute that explains how to tax compensation for services and I wrote a book anyway.”
This is a fantastic example of how “the movement” (Hendrickson has a lot of company) causes and has caused countless prison sentences, destroyed thousands of marriages and families, destroyed reputations, to say nothing of the untold billions of dollars in penalties and interest levied against those who’d believe such short-sighted curs as Hendrickson, Griswold, Elvick, Winterrowd, and ilk. Until you can actually hear and see the Tax Code explained by an actual
researcher, one trained in statutory interpretation and possessive of a clear technical legal writing ability, you’re stuck with the shoddy guesswork of that ilk.
With this climate of incompetence nobody’s risen to the top to illuminate a progression, a move forward in understanding and action. A move forward might sound like, “The IRS is
breaking the law by taking my money for [whatever tax]; that’s stealing!” Stop and think about that, about proof the IRS is stealing ... Suddenly it’s not about personal standing, state citizenship or status, or any of the rest of it. A further translation might be, “I know how that tax SHOULD be imposed, but the IRS misenforces the law to steal my money, my neighbor’s money - everybody’s money - It’s racketeering and extortion.”
When somebody violates felony statutes - AGAINST ANYONE - the victim’s status, residence, citizenship - none of that stands in the way of handcuffs for the offender. Would you like proof ... Everybody would like proof the IRS is breaking the law, admit it. Once that’s been proven, an entirely different set of wheels and tools start to operate, one’s that have nothing to do with who you are in
relation to the federal government; the State has a case against the offender.
Now ask yourself, “Does a felon want to talk to somebody who has proof of their crimes?” Of course the answer is “no,” especially if the felon is a public servant, a public official or politician; felony allegations are bad press/news every time. Once a felony
violation of the law is reasonably suspected, the felon is subject to citizens arrest by any and every other individuals (or group) who learns of the violation. Here’s an example of a felony violation of the law:
EXAMPLE: Does the IRS violate Tax Code § 83 when it demands part of your paycheck as an “income tax”? If you owe less money when
the IRS obeys the law, but you lose money when the IRS does what it does, isn’t the conduct of the IRS a racketeering scheme, where it steals from Americans in a pattern of corrupt and coercive policies? (18 USC § 1961). Isn’t it obvious that the IRS’ staff and its management are conspiring against your rights to property, isn’t that a felony? (Yes, 18 USC § 241). If the IRS and Dept. of Justice can’t even say why your interpretation of § 83 is mistaken, how can their conduct be anything other
than racketeering and conspiracy?
Now, if that conclusion is valid and remains without refutation, everybody in American can arrest every IRS employee and official; right?
Would you
rather do this?
Cower off the record wondering how to defend what you’ve been told is your strawman/status/CUSIP . . . blah blah blah when you get to court. Stumped when the judge and prosecutor steamroll you right into jail, probation, fines, or when an IRS employee contacts you over some amount from Hell; you don’t know what’s happening to
you.
Or would you rather do this?
Level the playing field with traffic enforcement and income tax authorities by proving their demands are felonious violations of state and federal law.
Prove with a memorandum they can’t contradict that their routine is in violation of the law, and to violate the law to get somebody else’s money or other property gives everyone (330 million people) the authority to slap the cuffs on the perp.
A PARADIGM SHIFT - You’ve never seen anyone turn the tables on gov’t like this, and every bit of it
is in-the-box, code pleading, doing only what the system allows. Did you detect any defense in this posture, or is it pure offense? Is this a good citizen for the corrupt and cowardly public servant to pursue?
Plenty of people lack the courage to confront gov’t about wrongdoing, so this paradigm shift isn’t for everyone. However, if “the
movement” and its stagnation have gotten old or boring to you, or if you want to assert conclusions based solely on law that prove the gov’t is out of line, you might be ready for the possibility that the law protects just about all of your rights, the possibility that you might just have a great deal of authority over public servants you’d never learn about from “the movement.” Lowell Becraft hasn’t endorsed anyone in recent memory, basically nobody since at least 1992 as far as we can
tell:
July 21, 2017 on LWRN, Lowell Becraft regarding David Myrland: “I’ve known this guy for fifteen years, I know him to be a diligent student of the law, he’s dug into the Internal Revenue Code, he speaks with authority, he’s done a lot of research, and he is battling the system. . . . He’s got a web site, and I invite all of our
listeners to go there and spend the time because this is an extremely important topic, it has constitutional significance. . . . As always you’re a great guest and I want to have you back.”
WEvGOV.com
TalkShoe.com/tc/59615
TalkShoe.com/tc/87488
--
Private email message, & any
attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 for the sole use of the intended recipient,contains privileged & or confidential information. To all public servants, including but not limited to Federal, State, or Local corporate government(s), I accept your oath of office as your firm and binding contract between you and me, one of the People, whereby you have promised to serve, protect, and defend me, guarantee all of my unalienable rights,
& defend the Constitution for the united States of America.
