The claimant is always bound to prove: the burden of proof lies on him. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 3rd rev. 8th ed., s.v. “Maxim
5 U.S. Code Subchapter II- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
5 U.S. Code § 556- Hearings; presiding employees; powers and duties; burden of proof; evidence; record as basis of decision.
"...the proponent of a rule or order has the
burden of proof." 5 U.S. Code § 556 (d)
The claimant is always bound to prove: the burden of proof lies on him. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 3rd rev. 8th ed., s.v. “Maxim
These agents, many unwittingly, are alleging you all what
tax and demanding payment. Many of us know it amounts to nothing more than extortion!
In lieu of responding with statement of facts/affidavits where you have the burden of proof, would it not be better to conditionally accept, which is basically saying I conditionally accept your offer upon proof of claim or would draw your claim. Now you have shown that you’re not going to be argumentative and that you are willing to
settle the account upon verification.
- Make them prove that you are a taxpayer!
- Make them prove that you are a citizen of the United States!
- Make them prove they have delegation of authority to come into the union state!
- Make them prove that the secretary has congressional authority to leave the District of Columbia to speak to you!
If they can prove the previous 4 statements, that you are a taxpayer, that you are a citizen of the United States, and that they have delegation of authority, which I can assure you they never will you can always fall back on, how did you interpret
§83 that I have taxable income?