This case, a Florida case, has numerous of little tidbits of good points, inter alia to think about. I only highlighted some in a quick review to go back later, when time permits, to go over in more detail.
The two things that jumped out at me are “assistance of counsel” and this statement “…traffic violations, should be transferred to specialized administrative bodies."
The courts are consistently telling you, “You have a right to an attorney”
The SCOTUS said: The American Bar Association Special Committee on Crime Prevention and Control recently recommended, inter alia, that:
"Regulation of various types of conduct which harm no one other than those involved (e.g., public drunkenness, narcotics addiction, vagrancy, and deviant sexual behavior) should be taken out of the courts. The handling of these matters should be transferred to nonjudicial entities, such as detoxification centers, narcotics treatment centers and social service agencies. The handling of other nonserious
offenses, such as housing code and traffic violations, should be transferred to specialized administrative bodies." Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 US 25 - 1972
The American Bar Association [Attorneys] recommends for the [incompetent] who should or should not have right to counsel.
Since I live in Florida, using the Florida Statutes, as I do the Federal Statutes, to prove the statutes are not for me! Let’s take and use what the American Bar Association’s recommended, “…traffic violations, should be transferred to specialized administrative bodies."
THE MAN POINT I AM DRIVING HERE IS AN
“ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY IS HAVING POWER NOT DERIVED FROM THE CONSTITUTION!”
TITLE X, PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
The definition of agency found in the 2012 as follows:
120.52 Definitions. – As used in this act:
(1) “Agency” means the following officers or governmental entities if acting pursuant to powers other than those derived from the constitution:
However in the 2009 version it has a footnote what says:
2Note.--Section 2, ch. 2009-187, provides that "[t]he amendments to subsection 120.52(1), Florida Statutes, made by this act are not intended to effect a substantive change in meaning of that subsection. The amendments are intended to clarify and simplify existing law and are intended to be consistent with judicial interpretations of that statute."
In 2008 it read a little differently, to wit:
2008 F.S. 120.52 (1)(a) the term “Agency” means “[t]he Governor in the exercise of all executive powers other than those derived from the constitution.”
The above (similar) definitions should be found in your state statutes as well.
I found that all administrative agencies, state or federal, their sole purpose is for “COMMERCE”
WAKEUP AMERICANS start taking control of your cities, counties and state, we are going to need to learn, practice and exercise how to take control of our elected servants and let the judicial branch know that the people are not a bunch of dummies (Strawman).
