Do you still want to argue that you are not a citizen of the United States, or any other jurisdictional challenges?

Even though you are absolutely correct when you know that in Title 26 USC, the Internal Revenue Code, the terms “CITIZEN”, “RESIDENT”, “TAXPAYER”, “PERSON”, AND “INDIVIDUAL” all these TERMS denotes artificial entities, which you can benefit from; read on!

The functions of State have been so vast and persuasive that it is now virtually impossible to breathe without accepting some benefit from the State and therefore granting the State a basis to evidence your alleged conscious intent to acquiesce to its rule over you. (paying property taxes, driver license, government-funded schools, paying income taxes, Social Security number, marriage license, hunting or fishing license or any other license, etc.) As a result, life has become a nightmare.

The old adage that the price of liberty is eternal vigilance has been amplified to such colossal proportions that if one spent a full 24 hours a day engaging in nothing but endeavoring to identify and rebut the presumptions of benefit the State claims you accept and which therefore purports to entitle the government to rule you, you would not begin to be able to discern them all, despite the maxims:

for we ought to be helped by a benefit, not destroyed by it. Dig. 13. 6, 17. 3; Broom, Max 392

No man is presumed to do anything against nature. 12 Vin. Abr.154

I mainly have focused on IRS issues with success.  I believe the reason for some of my success is because I dropped all the arguments with the attitude that a mistake has been made, if I am liable for a tax that is imposed on me I only have two questions:

What tax I been made liable for? "The taxpayers were entitled to know the basis of law and fact on which the Commissioner sought to sustain the deficiencies." Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co., 300 U.S. 481, 498 (1937)

How did §83 operate in your conclusion I owe a tax?

GET ALL THE INFORMATION AT WEvGOV.com