POWER AND JURISDICTION
Posted on July 18, 2011, by Ed
What is the point of intentionally failing to adopt the Constitution of September 17, 1787? The best answer
explains what would have resulted if the Constitution of September 17, 1787, had been adopted.
Adoption of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, would have created a government and legal system solely for the territory owned by the United States of America. Such a government and legal system would have to be recognized as limited to the territory owned by the United States of
America by all those taking the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”
By aborting the adoption of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the Framers and their constitutional co-conspirators could claim the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was a replacement for the genuine federal constitution, the Articles of Confederation of November 15,
1777. The failure to adopt the Constitution of September 17, 1787, allowed it to revise the Articles of Confederation in accordance with Article IX of those Articles.
The two claimed “federal judicial jurisdictions,” exclusive and concurrent were contrived between the so-called Founding Fathers and the States, which would be without legislative and taxation power without their
participation in the Great Constitution Conspiracy.
There is no exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction there is only proprietary power.
The truth about law and government is intertwined and connected to the rest of truth in the universe.
