Below is similar to what a grand jury room looks like.
However, I am sure that different venues have different rooms.  Very informal atmosphere.

Imagine if you will 18 to 24 people sitting in the room that the DOJ wants you to convince that you're innocent of any alleged crimes.

I felt at the time, and far more strongly today, in order to convince 18 to 24 people thinking I am a dishonest man and therefore being skeptical of me, because of what the government has already told them, I felt I should let the government make the statements that I want to tell the jurist for me.

For an example – the 16th amendment states that government has the power to lay and collect taxes. I don't argue that and I do not deny what is clearly stated in the Constitution for the United States of America. All I want to know is, 

Where is the law from which Congress extended the authority to the Secretary to the 50 states?
Then I gave them my firm promise see below.

With open arms and pointing to the DOJ after making my firm promise… That would have been the perfect opportunity for the DOJ to answer the question in order to get the grand jury to come back with an indictment, but he failed to communicate any delegation of authority going back to the 16th amendment.

acceptance by silence. Acceptance of an offer not by explicit words but through the lack of an offeree’s response in circumstances in which the relationship between the offeror and the offeree justifies both the offeror’s expectation of a reply and the offeror’s reasonable conclusion that the lack of one signals acceptance. ● Ordinarily, silence does not give rise to an acceptance of an offer, but this exception arises when the offeree has a duty to speak. Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed., s.v. “Acceptance.”

Qui tacet consentire videtur ubi tractatur de ejus commodo. A party who is silent is considered as assenting, when his advantage is debated. [Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 3rd rev., 8th ed., s.v. “Maxim”]

Idem est non probari et non esse; non deficit jus, sed probatio. What does not appear and what is not is the same; it is not the defect of the law, but the want of proof. [Ibid]

Stabit præsumptio donec probetur in contrarium. A presumption will stand good until the contrary is proved. [Ibid]

Quod per recordum probatum, non debet esse negatum. What is proved by the record, ought not to be denied. [Ibid]
]

 

I would like you to consider joining QuickSilver. You not buying a usable worthless product. The fact is your buying intrinsic value with a debt instrument. Something that you can retained in a draw and later sell it for more money than what you paid for it. And at the same time you will be helping me with the cost to provide you with this information. Of course you can also make money by joining QuickSilver by offering it to your friends and family to the point where you would get your silver for free.
 

So I ask you, would it be a benefit for you to receive free Silver?

FINANCIAL FREEDOM AHEAD