Construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress

LII / U.S. Code / Title 28 / PART IV / CHAPTER 85 / § 1366

Construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress § 1366. Construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress For the purposes of this chapter.

The 1^st sentence I find it to be very interesting… “laws of the United States or Act of Congress.”

The people of these united States needs to get back to reality.  No more Peter Pan, Mickey Mouse or being tolerant with all the nonsense that the looney tunes are wanting us to accept!

If we are to survive as People let's get Organic!

Let us start with ORGANIC LAW!!!! 

US CODE TITLE 18

Definitions

LII / U.S. Code / Title 18PART II / CHAPTER 207 / § 3156

… is in violation of an Act of Congress and is triable in any court established by Act of Congress; (3) the term “felony” means an offense punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of more than one

18 U.S. Code § 4001 - Limitation on detention; control of prisons

1. No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress.

Using Boggs as a prime example here, Boggs was indicted, tried, and convicted without the plaintiff ever having to put any evidence on the record as to the jurisdiction of the court [Act of Congress] 

When Boggs was pursuing the plaintiff in court to put the jurisdiction on the record, the plaintiff did not have to answer. The judge, on the other hand, intervened and said, this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 18 §3231, which states:

The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States.

Nothing in this title shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof.

In reviewing 18 §3231 historical notes, we find:

The language of said section 588d of title 12, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which related to bank robbery, or killing or kidnapping as an incident thereto (see section 2113, of this title), and which read “Jurisdiction over any offense defined by sections 588b and 588c of this title shall not be reserved exclusively to courts of the United States” was omitted as adequately covered by this section.

THIS IS WILL CHANGE COMMERCE

https://AmericanLiberties.Mytzt.com

The question here that needs to be answered defined “United States”; in other words, there are 3 definitions the Supreme Court has defined “United States” which one are you referring to judge? The inquiring minds need to know.

I don’t believe at this time; it out I have to go through the exercise of demonstrating the definition of “State” and “United States” so now we move on.

There is no “ACT OF CONGRESS” that Boggs was convicted of.

The Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue is an office established by an Act of Congress. (12 Stat.432) on July 1, 1862, and the 1^st Commissioner of Internal Revenue took office on July 17, 1862. 

However, pursuant to the Federal Register, VOL. 39, NO. 62— FRIDAY, MARCH 29, 1974, PAGE 11572, you will find DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, starting at section 1111 Establishment of the Internal Revenue Service. It is here you will find that Congress thought they had established the Internal Revenue Service, that is not the case. If they had the Internal Revenue Service would have the privilege of exercising franking all letters and documents pertaining to the office of the Internal Revenue Code.

The fact in evidence is, the Internal Revenue Service is not an Act of Congress. Therefore, the question begs who is the Internal Revenue Service?