These following quotes allegedly from court cases I tried to confirm, which I was unable
to do so. These court cases were found on many websites that many people rely on for information. That is why it is extremely important to verify if you are personally going to use them. The court cases are:
“Proceedings in a court are legally void where there is an absence of jurisdiction.” Scott v. McNeal 154 US 34; Re: Bonner, 151 US 242.;
“Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be ‘assumed’ it must be proved to exist”. — Stuck v Medical Eaminers, 94 Ca.2d 751, 211 P. 2s 389
“Jurisdiction once challenged cannot be assumed and must be decided”. — Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S.Ct. 2502
“No sanction can be
imposed absent proof of jurisdiction”. — Stanard v. Olesen, 74 S. Ct. 768
“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings”. Hagans
v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533
“If any tribunal finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over person and subject matter, the case must be dismissed”. Louisville Rail Road v. Motley, 211 U.S. 149, 29 S.Ct. 42 (BUT REMEMBER, YOU MUST OBJECT AND MOVE THE COURT TO ORDER THIS)
“Jurisdiction is essential to give validity to the determination of administrative agencies and where jurisdictional requirements are not satisfied, the action of the agency is a nullity…” City Street
Improvement Co. v. Pearson, 181 C. 640, 185 P. 962,
The following court cases below were confirmed, which many of them I pulled off the same websites; they are:
No sanction shall be imposed or substantive rule or order be issued except within jurisdiction delegated to the agency and as authorized by law." June 11, 1946, c. 324, § 9, 60 Stat. 242. See Stanard v. Olesen, 1954, 74 S.Ct. 768, Mr. Justice Douglas' opinion; Cates v. Haderlein, 1951, 342 U.S. 804, 72 S.Ct. 47, 96 L.Ed. 609; Door v. Donaldson,
1952, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 188, 195 F.2d 764, 765.
“When it appears, as it does here, that a court does not have jurisdiction, it is the duty of the court to immediately dismiss the action.” Stanard v. Olesen, 121 F. Supp. 607, 610 (S.D. Cal. 1954)
“…federal jurisdiction cannot be assumed, but must be clearly shown”. — Brooks v. Yawkey, 200 F. 2d 633
Curley v. US 791 F. Supp. 52, 55 - Dist. Court, ED
New York, 1992. "However, failure to adhere to agency regulations may amount to a denial of due process if the regulations are required by the constitution or a statute"
However, failure to adhere to agency regulations may amount to a denial of due process if the regulations are required by the constitution or a statute. See
Arzanipour v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 866 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 814, 110 S.Ct. 63, 107 L.Ed.2d 30 (1989).
"district courts must decide issues of subjectmatter jurisdiction first, reaching issues of personal jurisdiction "only if subject-matter jurisdiction is found to
exist." 145 F. 3d, at 214. Noting Steel Co. `s instruction that subject-matter jurisdiction must be "`established as a threshold matter,' " 145 F. 3d, at 217 (quoting 523 U. S., at 94)," Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 US 574, 582. 1999
"These distinctions do not mean that subject-matter jurisdiction is ever and always the
more "fundamental." Personal jurisdiction, too, is "an essential element of the jurisdiction of a district . . . court," without which the court is "powerless to proceed to an adjudication." Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Bryant, 299 U. S. 374, 382 (1937). Cited in Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 US 574, 584
a federal
court first resolves doubts about its jurisdiction over the subject matter, but there are circumstances in which a district court appropriately accords priority to a personal jurisdiction inquiry. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 US 574, 578. 1999
"Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause.
Jurisdiction is power to declare the law, and when it ceases to exist, the only function remaining to the court is that of announcing the fact and dismissing the cause." Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 523 US 83, 94 1998
