Some brought this to my attention, see below

I do so much want to share all of what I have learned,  (I have years of experience with documents of what works and what does not work), with everyone, but I need funding, Also I need good health, there is nothing better than health and wealth.  Let's get healthy 

There is no remedy in challenging a court jurisdiction,  except by abating its process, first.

Abatements are not a challenge to a court jurisdiction, merely a good faith attempt to correct errors in process, "clear up the errors, judge, and I'll appear." Special  appearances fail when a judge knows what he is doing. Under martial rule, judges do whatever they want, whenever they want so long as he/she does not alarm the public or disturb the peace. Jurisdiction is always granted to try jurisdictional questions, even if one goes to higher courts. Defendants grant jurisdiction without knowing it, because they never challenge the process that creates the jurisdiction in the first place. 

(see: FRCP §12.(b)(1), (2), and /or (3).

FRCrP  §12 (b)(3)(A)(B)

Remember, many of us know that we are not in UNITED STATES/D.C. but also many of us are not successful in convincing who we need to convince!  

WE ARE FOREIGN TO THE UNITED STATES

Foreign State: A foreign country or nation. The several United States are considered "foreign" to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. Black's Law Dictionary 4th. Revised  Ed. 1968.

28 U.S. Code § 297 - Assignment of judges to courts of the freely associated compact states
(a)The Chief Justice or the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit may assign any circuit, district, magistrate, or territorial judge of a court of the Ninth Circuit, with the consent of the judge so assigned, to serve temporarily as a judge of any duly constituted court of the freely associated compact states whenever an official duly authorized by the laws of the respective compact state requests such assignment and such assignment is necessary for the proper dispatch of the business of the respective court.
(b)The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) of all necessary travel expenses, including transportation, and of subsistence, or of a reasonable per diem allowance in lieu of subsistence. The judge shall report to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts any amount received pursuant to this subsection.

When I first has learn this, I was doing abatements regarding traffic tickets not knowing I was doing abatements, the results was it worked every time.

Then did it with the investigation of me via grand jury in 2006-7, again never arguing the merits of the case.

Notes from BOUVIER'S LAW DICTIONARY AND CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA, RAWLE'S THIRD REVISION, (BEING THE EIGHTH EDITION) 1984
 

Matter in abatement dehors the record is properly presented by plea in abatement; Schofield v. Palmer, 134 Fed. 753.
AS TO THE PERSON OF THE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT. It may be pleaded as to the plaintiff, that there never was such a person in rerum natura; (cites omitted). That one of the plaintiff's is a fictitious person, to defeat the action as to all; this would also be a good plea in bar; that That the nominal plaintiff in the action of the inject me is fictitious, is not plea the ball in any manner;

Corporations. A plea in abatement is the proper manner of contesting the existence of an alleged corporation plaintiff. (Case cites omitted) Pg., 8.

It must contain a direct, full, and positive averment of all material facts;… Must give enough as to enable the plaintiff by an amendment completely to supply the defect or avoid the mistake on which the plea is founded; it must have an apt and proper beginning and conclusion; it cannot be pleaded after making full defense; ... A plea in abatement and a plea or answer in bar cannot be pleaded together;  (case cites omitted) Pg., 15.

As to the time of pleading matter in abatement, it must be pleaded before any plea to the merits, both in civil and criminal cases, except in cases where it arises or comes to the knowledge of the party subsequently; (case cites omitted) Pg., 16.

I do so much want to share most of what I have learned,  (I have years of experience with documents of what works and what does not work), with everyone but I need funding, continuance funding that is why I selected CROWFUNDING using this platform. By gifting 1 time you receive 4 times... see below for the webinar tonight to help me help others that will help you.