The following is from the late Melvin Stamper, JD. Professor at
law
What is really happening in these Willful Failure to File prosecutions is that the Judge is operating on the penal clause to a civil contract. And since you have agreed to be bound by Title 26, what difference does it make whether or not Title 26 was
ever enacted by the Congress?
When new Federal Judges are hired (nominated by the President and later confirmed by the Senate after hearings by the Senate Judiciary Committee -- after they go through that hiring procedure in Washington -- they are taken back to Washington and are
taken into private seminars that are sponsored by the United States Department of Justice. It is in these seminars that new Federal Judges are taught and trained "how to" manage their criminal proceedings so as to avoid reversible error, i.e., absence of counsel and trial procedure, etc. They are taught and trained what the Supreme Court of the United States wants for perfecting due process. They are given Supreme Court cases to study -- and sitting next to that new Judge in these seminars is
their Appeals Court Justice (who will be auditing appeals coming out of their trial court) confirming that the information being taught and presented by Justice Department lawyers is true and correct and that "Things will be done this way.
They are given a "Bench Book" to take with them, giving the new Judge guidance on handling problems as they arise on the bench. Finally, the interesting part comes: They are taught how to manage "Tax Protester trials -- violations of Title 26. Federal
Judges have been instructed that the Supreme Court ruled in 1896 in a case called Davis vs. Elmira Savings, 161 U.S 275 that banks are instrumentalities of the Congress.
"National banks are instrumentalities of the Federal government, created for a public purpose, and as such necessarily subject to the paramount authority of the United States."
In other words, the interstate system of banks is the private property of the King. This means that any profit or gain anyone experienced by a bank/thrift and loan/employee credit union -- any regulated financial institution carries with it — as an
operation of law -- the identical same full force and effect as if the King himself created the gain. So as an operation of law, anyone who has a depository relationship, or a credit relationship, with a bank, such as checking, savings, CD's, charge cards, car loan, real estate mortgages, etc., are experiencing profit and gain created by the King -- so says the Supreme Court.
Therefore; David Myrland's discovery on § 83, followed by several favorable court decisions, in my opinion, is your statutory savior when it comes to court, although the problem now is the
courts are so corrupt they want to run from it. This why you want to get it on the administrative record long before court.
Therefore you just have to control what goes in your record to get your remedy
|
|
|
