I am going through much of my study material from years ago and sharing with you highlights of information that has delivered me from the evil ones.
What I want to make clear is that:
A smart man learns by his mistakes; a wise man learns from other's mistakes. BE WISE!
Having a document notarized, especially in the manner provided in our paperwork, constitutes unimpeachable third-party witness. You can make claims all day, such as that you are the living principal and not the strawman, but
without a formal and unimpeachable third-party witness, your declarations are of little (if any) force and effect.
|
Using a notary to send and receive documents is far superior to
sending them yourself.
While many officials may ignore or try to buffalo you, they may be far less inclined to perpetrate their shenanigans when dealing with an officer of the court whose records are unimpeachable evidence.
When no response from a respondent is received by the notary within the required time frame, and the notary issues a certificate of non-response (CNR), it is a certificate of dishonor.
At this point the dishonor of the respondent is established on the commercial record. He is now recorded as stipulating that he is without claim and that you have no liability.
The key to the notarial process is that a certificate of non-response issued by a notary is not only a certificate of dishonor, but also a judgment in estoppel, signifying that you have exhausted administrative remedies and established
commercial/administrative res judicata on the public record (notary). Do not use the terms "fault" and "default," which are statutory. A default may be challenged and re-opened at any time, even years later.
If you utilize each CNR as an estoppel and notarial certificate of dishonor rather than a default, the matter is rendered unassailable.
The first certificate of non-response is a judgment in estoppel on the law (contract between the parties). Y ou can continue the process to get your administrative remedy, that is to discharge an obligation but use the process to better
oneself commercially. If all you wish to do is to end the matter definitively, only the first CNR (estoppel on the law) is necessary, which you may use as a foundation thereafter—both judicially and nonjudicially— for securing closure on the matter.
Your Donation helps with cost of Websites, research,
and so many other incidental cost
throughout the year.
We must remember who and what a notary is. Historically, the notary wrote the king's papers. He issued the writs. A public notary is higher than a judge (although very few notaries seem to understand this), inasmuch as no judge can act
without a record, and notaries are, as it were, ultimate record-keepers of the world. In both law and commerce, "the reality is the record." The bookkeeper is king. The record is the underlying facts, evidence, and truth of a matter. No judge can function on anything other than the paperwork on his desk. In a genuine, bona fide commercial record, all documents and ledger entries are done by some particular, identified being taking personal, legal, and commercial
responsibility for the veracity, accuracy, relevance, and verifiability of everything claimed, stated, or alleged. All such documents or ledger entries are explicitly or implicitly sworn true, correct, and complete, and are binding on whatever real being utters them. The system functions by a colorable imitation of this fundamental commercial truth, so that those in the system do not (and cannot) make any claims or allegations "sworn true, correct, and complete," or take
personal responsibility/liability for whatever they state, but "declare true and correct" as strawmen, assigning authority and liability for the veracity, accuracy, relevance, and verifiability of whatever they state or allege on the fictitious system instead of themselves. Then it is the system that is presumed to be making the claims, not the real being. The system is a fiction owned by those coming after you, so lots of luck trying to get it to hold itself accountable
for its own machinations. The point is to put those coming after you back on the hook by making them accountable for their actions (as in real life). This is a major reason for doing paperwork by affidavit sworn true, correct, and complete, with a notarial jurat and acknowledgment. If an official wishes to counter any such affidavit, he can legitimately do so only through point-for-point rebuttal of your affidavit by counter-affidavit sworn true, correct, and
complete—which he cannot and will not do because he is not speaking and acting for himself, but for and as the fictitious system. The entire system succeeds by providing a fabricated forum by and through which officials, attorneys, etc., can operate with impunity and in the absence of personal accountability. It works because we take things at face value without invoking the truth of the situation. We have been relentlessly conditioned from birth to "respect authority"
(theirs, not ours), and thereby throw our lives away.
It is of great value to us that through the notary we can place unimpeachable evidence into a court case for the record, as the notarial certification allows/requires free transit between jurisdictions. A jurat is an oath, and the most
binding and solemn notarial certification. It is sworn (implicitly before God) true, correct, and complete, establishing the irrefutable subjective truth of the affiant. Some authorities state that a document bearing a jurat is also an apostille, which is reasonable. An acknowledgment, on the other hand, constitutes mandatory admissibility in court as evidence. The notary text on the documents in this package constitute both a jurat and an acknowledgment. The
text also references the name of the affiant (in his real, living, sovereign capacity) three (3) times, giving the text considerable significance. Three (3) is a crucial number in law and commerce, as in virtually all religions and philosophies.
|
|
|
